Xamanismo Coletivo<p><a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/DigitalSovereignity" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>DigitalSovereignity</span></a> needs <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/StructuralPower" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>StructuralPower</span></a></p><p>"Who enforces digital standards such as those that come from the <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/IETF" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>IETF</span></a> or the <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/W3C" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>W3C</span></a>?<br>In a few cases, it is state power (e.g. accessibility in some jurisdictions) but that's rare. In some other cases, it's market discipline… But most of the important areas of the <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/digitalsphere" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>digitalsphere</span></a> have stopped being open, competitive markets over a decade ago so that the market no longer has a credible disciplining function to enforce <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/standards" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>standards</span></a>. What matters is who has the <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/structuralpower" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>structuralpower</span></a> to deploy the standards they want to see and avoid those they dislike."<br><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@robin" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>robin</span></a></span> </p><p><a href="https://berjon.com/digital-sovereignty/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">berjon.com/digital-sovereignty</span><span class="invisible">/</span></a></p>