Is there something like the #MITLicense (or #GPL) that is copyleft/permissive EXCEPT not allowing training, etc., of #ML / #AI / #LLM ?

What does it mean to say that two licenses are "compatible?" Read the answer on our #GPLFAQ page: https://u.fsf.org/3wl #GPL

What does it mean to say that two licenses are "compatible?" Read the answer on our #GPLFAQ page: https://u.fsf.org/3wl #GPL

→ Une #intelligence #artificielle libre est-elle possible ?
https://linuxfr.org/news/une-intelligence-artificielle-libre-est-elle-possible#toc-le-r%25C3%25A9seau-de-neurones

« Posons-nous un instant la question : qu’est-ce que le #code #source d’un réseau de #neurones ? […] La #GPL fournit une définition : le code source est la forme de l’œuvre privilégiée pour effectuer des #modifications. Dans cette acception, le code source d’un réseau de neurones serait l’#algorithme d’entraînement, le réseau de neurones de départ et le #corpus sur lequel le réseau a été entraîné »

I am doing a webinar tomorrow on "Maths Education with the #Moodle STACK Question Type"
https://moodle.academy/calendar/view.php?view=day&course=1&time=1743494400#event_26872

I had made a short video to promote it but my colleague at @catalysteu took the mp4 and tightened it up rather nicely

This is the service we offer (but its all #GPL)

https://www.catalyst-eu.net/service/moodle-stack-hosting

#licesing question.

People share (a)gpl code on github. Github is not available everywhere (even read access I think).

Does that break the GPL?

"...must prominently offer all users interacting with it remotely through a computer network (if your version supports such interaction) an opportunity to receive the Corresponding Source of your version by providing access to the Corresponding Source from a network server at no charge, through some standard or customary means of facilitating copying of software"

(AGPL 3, section 13)

The dedication of @rms to the GNU project and his work on copyleft licenses have made a profound impact on the software world. Through the GPL, RMS has ensured that software users retain essential freedoms - freedoms to use, study, change and share. #FreeSoftware #SoftwareFreedom #GPL #Copyleft

Mathe-Ass hat jetzt Sparklines pro Level für eure Zeiten:

https://www.draketo.de/anderes/mathe-ass

»Löse die Aufgaben und steige Stufen auf. Knacke deine Zeiten«

Den zweiten Teil unterstützt es hiermit jetzt besser.

Um in Level 1 das Maximum zu erreichen, müsst ihr unter 2 Sekunden kommen

Mathe-Ass ist #FreieSoftware unter #GPL, die Quellen sind komplett in https://hg.sr.ht/~arnebab/draketo/browse/anderes/mathe-ass.org

Have questions about possible violations of #GNU licenses? We have answers! Check out all the questions and answers on our FAQ page at https://u.fsf.org/3kx #GPL

What if I discover a possible violation of the GPL? "You should report it. First, check the facts as best you can. Then tell the publisher or copyright holder of the specific GPL-covered program." Read the full answer https://u.fsf.org/3ks #GNUGPLFAQ #GPL

so, uh, the GPL's text proposes that an interactive-mode program should display something like this when starting up:

<program> Copyright (C) <year> <name of author>
This program comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type "show w".
This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; type "show c" for details.

and i just realized that this is awfully similar to the way GDB's interface works. the notice is different, and the commands are show copying and show warranty instead, but you can see how the two are related.

if anything, this makes me think that the text used in the GPL might have been taken from an earlier version of GDB, back when show had fewer possible parameters and it was possible to unambiguously assign show c and show w to "show the program's license" and "show the warranty info"...

@bkuhn any advice for choosing #copyleft #licenses for #Rust code?

In a recent thread you mentioned #LGPL and I'm curious about templating.

In my understanding it's not possible for the user to replace just the LGPLd library on their system, so it's effectively the same as #GPL .
I chose #MPL 2.0 instead.

Same problem exists in C++ template-only libraries, but I found no ultimate guide.

Are you aware of any?

How do I use GNU licenses for my own software? We are glad you asked! Please see our "GPL how to" page for the full answer and thank you for making the ethical choice! https://u.fsf.org/2b5 #GPL

My games Ball2Box, Pocket Broomball and Sn4ke will be removed from the Apple Appstore by the end of April.

They are licensed
under AGPLv3 and this license is incompatible with the Apple Appstore, because the ToS of the store put additional restrictions on the rights of the users.

I guess the only way to release my games to iOS will be trough alt stores, but I don't know if they are incompatible with copy left licenses too.
https://altstore.io/ seems interesting.

I have wanted to use the #collaboraonline online office suite for my online Office suite for a long time.
After a lot of experime

ntation and learning I have it working on my self hosted #Nextcloud and it does what I want and seems responsive. However one of the big learning points is that most of my online writing requirements are met with the built in #markdown editor.

What if I discover a possible violation of the GPL? "You should report it. First, check the facts as best you can. Then tell the publisher or copyright holder of the specific GPL-covered program." Read the full answer https://u.fsf.org/3ks #GNUGPLFAQ #GPL

You all have the right to write #FreeSoftware, and you write whatever you want.

And when you look at what software other people are writing, keep it in mind, that they have the right to write whatever software they feel like.

They even have all rights to license it under #MIT or #BSD licenses, because everyone has the right to make objectively wrong decisions, too

https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1jjo1hv/a_tremendous_feature_of_open_source_software_is/